Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM
Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM

You bought a SOAR platform to tame the chaos in your security operations center. The real challenge starts now, proving its financial worth to the people who control the budget. It’s not just about faster incident response. It’s about translating that speed into a language everyone understands: dollars and cents.
Without clear ROI metrics, your SOAR investment becomes a cost center, vulnerable when budgets tighten. The good news is that proving value is a methodical process, one that hinges on the data your tools are already generating. Keep reading to learn how to build an undeniable business case for your security automation.
We remember the first time we saw a SOAR playbook cut a phishing investigation from an hour to under a minute. The team was stunned, almost disbelieving. That moment wasn’t just about technology. It was about reclaiming time, the most finite resource in a security team.
The financial justification followed naturally. You can’t manage what you don’t measure, and a SOAR platform is a data goldmine for proving its own value. The key is knowing which numbers to pull and how to frame them.
Before you can claim any improvement, you need a clear picture of where you started. This baseline is your anchor, the “before” snapshot that makes the “after” meaningful. Many teams skip this step, and their ROI calculations lack credibility.
Gather data from the 3-6 months before your SOAR implementation. Look at your ticketing system, SIEM logs, and even manual spreadsheets analysts might have kept. You’re hunting for specific, quantifiable figures.
The most critical ones are your Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) for common incidents like phishing emails or malware alerts. How many incidents did a typical analyst handle per shift? What was the average labor cost per incident? This historical data transforms vague claims of “efficiency gains” into hard, defensible numbers.
Without this baseline, you’re guessing at your improvement. With it, you have a solid foundation for all subsequent calculations. It turns anecdotal evidence into a data-driven story.
| Metric | Value (Example) | Source |
| Average MTTR (Phishing) | 62 minutes | Ticketing system |
| Weekly Incident Volume | 1,450 alerts | SIEM logs |
| Analyst Hours on Manual Tasks | 95 hours/week | Analyst time tracking |
| Fully Burdened Labor Cost | USD 75/hour | HR cost model |

A SOAR platform isn’t meant to be a black box. It’s designed to report on what it’s doing, as it does it. The real challenge is setting it up to collect the right data on its own. That starts with building ROI tracking straight into your playbooks, almost like wiring your automation with its own measuring instruments.
This approach is essential for reducing security analyst workload effectively, as automation captures and relieves repetitive tasks, letting your team focus on higher-value investigations. Most current SOAR tools let you drop tracking nodes inside a workflow. Those nodes can quietly record details such as:
Take a playbook for threat intelligence enrichment. It can mark the exact time it kicks off and the exact time it finishes. The gap between those timestamps is pure time saved, which you can multiply by an analyst’s hourly rate. Over time, that level of detail builds a clear, auditable trail of value, shift after shift, case after case.
You also need to zoom out and watch the bigger operational patterns, not just isolated tasks:
A lower MTTR across your environment makes a great headline metric, but the real strength comes from the raw data underneath it: each automated step, each saved minute, each avoided manual action. When that stream of data is captured continuously, those quarterly or annual ROI reviews stop feeling like forensic digs through old logs. They become a straightforward roll‑up of numbers you’ve been collecting all along.

The math for ROI is simple on paper, but the meaning comes from what you put into it. Basic formula: ROI = (Total Benefits − Total Costs) / Total Costs × 100% So the real work is how you define “benefits” and “costs.” That’s where most teams either make their case strong, or way too soft.
For many organizations, partnering with experts in SOAR implementation consulting services helps accurately capture these costs and benefits, ensuring a realistic and comprehensive ROI model.
Benefits usually break into two buckets:
a. Labor cost reduction
This is the cleanest place to start.
If automation saves 70 analyst-hours per week, and your fully loaded labor rate is $75 per hour, then:
That alone can cover a big chunk of a SOAR investment, sometimes all of it.
b. Risk reduction
This part is harder to put a price tag on, but it matters a lot.
When MTTR drops, your exposure window during an incident shrinks. That can mean:
Some teams estimate this by looking at:
It’s still an estimate, but it’s better than pretending the risk side is worth $0.
c. Reduced analyst turnover
Burnout in security operations is real. Automation that cuts repetitive work can:
You can roughly estimate this by:
On the cost side, you want to be honest and complete, not just “license line item from the contract.”
Include:
It’s better to slightly overestimate costs and still show a strong ROI than to be accused of inflating the numbers.
Let’s say you build a model for one year:
Now plug into the formula:
ROI = (400,000 − 150,000) / 150,000 × 100
ROI = 250,000 / 150,000 × 100
ROI ≈ 166%
That 166% isn’t just a nice number, it changes the whole conversation.
You’re no longer arguing about features, integrations, or how clever a playbook is. You’re showing that for every dollar spent, the business is getting more than two dollars back, in plain financial language that a CFO can act on.
| Category | Amount (USD) | Notes |
| Labor Savings | 273,000 | Reduced manual work |
| Risk Reduction Value | 95,000 | Faster containment |
| Lower Turnover Savings | 32,000 | Reduced burnout/replacement |
| Total Annual Benefits | 400,000 | — |
| SOAR Licensing + Maintenance | 110,000 | Vendor contract |
| Implementation + Training | 40,000 | Internal + external |
| Total Annual Costs | 150,000 | — |
| Calculated ROI | 166% | Based on standard formula |

Proving ROI isn’t a single report you build and forget. It’s an ongoing habit. The numbers you track today should guide what you improve next week, next quarter, and next year. Continuous improvements in integrating SOAR with SIEM and EDR tools amplify your automation’s effectiveness, providing richer data sources and more seamless workflows that boost operational efficiency and security posture over time.
Regular reviews of your automation metrics will show you two things very clearly:
So you might see:
That kind of visibility tells you where to focus your tuning:
This way, your automation doesn’t just stay “good enough.” Its value keeps building, as you adapt it to new threats, new data sources, and new workflows.
One of the easiest mistakes is to do all this analysis and then hide it in a spreadsheet. That’s where momentum dies.
Instead, make the results simple to see and easy to reuse. For example, build a small dashboard for security and business leadership that highlights:
Then translate each metric into what it means for the business, not just the SOC:
You can even frame it in terms of business enablement:
When leaders see a clear connection between:
then budget conversations change. You’re not just defending a tool, you’re showing a strategic asset that:
And the data you’ve been tracking all along—that’s your proof.
Credits : The L&D Academy
Even with the best intentions, teams often stumble when measuring SOAR effectiveness. The most frequent mistake is focusing only on the big, flashy metrics like overall MTTR reduction. That’s important, but it doesn’t tell the whole story.
You need to dig into the granular data from individual playbooks to understand what’s working and what’s not. Another trap is failing to account for the initial time investment. Building playbooks and training the team has a real cost, and ignoring it inflates your early ROI figures.
Some organizations also forget to measure qualitative benefits. How has automation affected analyst morale and retention? Has it improved collaboration with other IT teams? These softer gains are harder to put a dollar figure on, but they contribute significantly to long-term SOC health. Finally, avoid setting and forgetting your metrics.
The threat landscape changes, and your playbooks should evolve with it. A quarterly review of your automation coverage and success rates ensures your SOAR investment remains aligned with current risks. This proactive approach prevents your ROI from decaying over time.
The goal is to create a measurement framework that is both comprehensive and adaptable. By anticipating these common missteps, you can build a more accurate and persuasive case for your automation efforts. It turns potential weaknesses in your argument into strengths.
You can track SOAR ROI metrics when you measure baseline MTTR, incident volume tracking, response time reduction, and analyst productivity gains. You compare automated vs manual steps with workflow automation logs. You check labor cost reduction, cost savings SOAR, and total benefits calculation. You add time saved calculator results to incident response ROI and return on investment security numbers.
You can use date range reports, automation coverage rate, playbook automation logs, playbook success rate, and enrichment time savings. You study false positive reduction and alert fatigue mitigation. You add breach prevention value, incident triage speed, and containment time metrics. You place everything into a total cost of ownership security view to see security orchestration ROI.
You check implementation costs SOAR, licensing expenses, training ROI impact, and integration complexity costs. You add annual savings projection, currency adjusted savings, and real world SOAR savings. You place numbers in an ROI formula security sheet. You include remediation ROI, compliance automation ROI, and cyber insurance savings to understand cost benefit analysis and quantitative SOAR value.
You review response playbook ROI, automation coverage rate, enrichment playbook efficiency, and workflow automation logs. You check SOC maturity metrics, efficiency benchmarking, and security operations center metrics. You add proactive response metrics, adaptive playbooks value, and AI driven automation ROI. You track qualitative benefits tracking and sustained ROI measurement to see value realization SOAR across time.
You load KPI dashboard SOAR with mean time to detect, anomaly detection savings, digital forensics acceleration, and evidence collection automation. You add reporting dashboard ROI and executive reporting metrics. You align numbers with CISO KPI alignment and budget justification SOAR. You compare cloud SOAR economics, on premise vs SaaS ROI, and TCO reduction to support return on investment security.
The numbers you track give you evidence you can bring to leadership. Clear ROI turns your SOAR into a business asset. You secure future budget. You also build a culture that relies on data. Start with a clean baseline. Track your metrics every week. Share your results in simple terms. Let the data show the value of your work.
You can strengthen these results with expert support. Explore our consulting services for MSSPs. You get guidance to simplify operations, cut tool sprawl, and improve service quality. The services include needs analysis, vendor shortlisting, PoC support, and actionable recommendations. You build a stack that fits your business goals and operational maturity.