You bought a SOAR platform to tame the chaos in your security operations center. The real challenge starts now, proving its financial worth to the people who control the budget. It’s not just about faster incident response. It’s about translating that speed into a language everyone understands: dollars and cents. 

Without clear ROI metrics, your SOAR investment becomes a cost center, vulnerable when budgets tighten. The good news is that proving value is a methodical process, one that hinges on the data your tools are already generating. Keep reading to learn how to build an undeniable business case for your security automation.

Key Takeaways

  1. Establish a pre-SOAR performance baseline for metrics like MTTR.
  2. Track quantifiable benefits like time saved and labor cost reduction.
  3. Calculate ROI using a standard formula that accounts for all costs and benefits.

Building Your Business Case from the Ground Up

We remember the first time we saw a SOAR playbook cut a phishing investigation from an hour to under a minute. The team was stunned, almost disbelieving. That moment wasn’t just about technology. It was about reclaiming time, the most finite resource in a security team. 

The financial justification followed naturally. You can’t manage what you don’t measure, and a SOAR platform is a data goldmine for proving its own value. The key is knowing which numbers to pull and how to frame them.

The Foundation: Your Pre-SOAR Baseline

Before you can claim any improvement, you need a clear picture of where you started. This baseline is your anchor, the “before” snapshot that makes the “after” meaningful. Many teams skip this step, and their ROI calculations lack credibility.

Gather data from the 3-6 months before your SOAR implementation. Look at your ticketing system, SIEM logs, and even manual spreadsheets analysts might have kept. You’re hunting for specific, quantifiable figures. 

The most critical ones are your Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) for common incidents like phishing emails or malware alerts. How many incidents did a typical analyst handle per shift? What was the average labor cost per incident? This historical data transforms vague claims of “efficiency gains” into hard, defensible numbers.

  • Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) for top incident types
  • Weekly incident volume handled by the SOC
  • Average analyst hours spent on manual, repetitive tasks
  • Fully burdened labor cost per analyst hour

Without this baseline, you’re guessing at your improvement. With it, you have a solid foundation for all subsequent calculations. It turns anecdotal evidence into a data-driven story.

MetricValue (Example)Source
Average MTTR (Phishing)62 minutesTicketing system
Weekly Incident Volume1,450 alertsSIEM logs
Analyst Hours on Manual Tasks95 hours/weekAnalyst time tracking
Fully Burdened Labor CostUSD 75/hourHR cost model

Tracking the Impact in Real Time

Analytics dashboard on laptop for measuring SOAR effectiveness roi with performance metrics and graphs

A SOAR platform isn’t meant to be a black box. It’s designed to report on what it’s doing, as it does it. The real challenge is setting it up to collect the right data on its own. That starts with building ROI tracking straight into your playbooks, almost like wiring your automation with its own measuring instruments. 

This approach is essential for reducing security analyst workload effectively, as automation captures and relieves repetitive tasks, letting your team focus on higher-value investigations. Most current SOAR tools let you drop tracking nodes inside a workflow. Those nodes can quietly record details such as:

  • Start and end time for each automated action
  • How many records or alerts were processed
  • How many analyst hours the same task would have taken by hand

Take a playbook for threat intelligence enrichment. It can mark the exact time it kicks off and the exact time it finishes. The gap between those timestamps is pure time saved, which you can multiply by an analyst’s hourly rate. Over time, that level of detail builds a clear, auditable trail of value, shift after shift, case after case.

You also need to zoom out and watch the bigger operational patterns, not just isolated tasks:

  • Automation coverage rate – what percentage of your alerts are touched by automation at all?
  • Playbook success rate – how often do key workflows complete as expected, without human rescue?
  • Trend in MTTR (Mean Time to Resolve) – are resolution times dropping as you add or tune automations?

A lower MTTR across your environment makes a great headline metric, but the real strength comes from the raw data underneath it: each automated step, each saved minute, each avoided manual action. When that stream of data is captured continuously, those quarterly or annual ROI reviews stop feeling like forensic digs through old logs. They become a straightforward roll‑up of numbers you’ve been collecting all along.

The ROI Calculation: From Data to Dollars

Security team discussing measuring SOAR effectiveness roi strategy in front of monitoring dashboards

The math for ROI is simple on paper, but the meaning comes from what you put into it. Basic formula: ROI = (Total Benefits − Total Costs) / Total Costs × 100% So the real work is how you define “benefits” and “costs.” That’s where most teams either make their case strong, or way too soft. 

For many organizations, partnering with experts in SOAR implementation consulting services helps accurately capture these costs and benefits, ensuring a realistic and comprehensive ROI model.

1. Defining Your Benefits

Benefits usually break into two buckets:

  • Hard savings (easy to price)
  • Soft savings (need more assumptions, but still real)

a. Labor cost reduction

This is the cleanest place to start.

If automation saves 70 analyst-hours per week, and your fully loaded labor rate is $75 per hour, then:

  • Weekly savings:
    70 hours × $75 = $5,250
  • Annual savings (52 weeks):
    $5,250 × 52 ≈ $273,000

That alone can cover a big chunk of a SOAR investment, sometimes all of it.

b. Risk reduction

This part is harder to put a price tag on, but it matters a lot.

When MTTR drops, your exposure window during an incident shrinks. That can mean:

  • Fewer compromised systems
  • Smaller “blast radius”
  • Lower recovery and remediation costs
  • Less chance of regulatory penalties after a big incident

Some teams estimate this by looking at:

  • Average cost per incident (from past data or industry reports)
  • Expected reduction in impact due to faster response

It’s still an estimate, but it’s better than pretending the risk side is worth $0.

c. Reduced analyst turnover

Burnout in security operations is real. Automation that cuts repetitive work can:

  • Lower turnover
  • Reduce recruiting costs
  • Cut training hours for new hires

You can roughly estimate this by:

  • Average cost to replace an analyst (recruiting + onboarding + ramp time)
  • Expected reduction in annual turnover after automation

2. Defining Your Costs

On the cost side, you want to be honest and complete, not just “license line item from the contract.”

Include:

  • SOAR license and maintenance fees
  • Implementation and professional services (if you used a partner or vendor services)
  • Internal time costs, such as:
    • Hours spent on playbook design and testing
    • Training analysts and engineers
    • Ongoing tuning and maintenance

It’s better to slightly overestimate costs and still show a strong ROI than to be accused of inflating the numbers.

3. A Realistic Example

Let’s say you build a model for one year:

  • Annual Benefits:
    • $400,000 (combined from labor savings + risk reduction + lower turnover)
  • Annual Costs:
    • $150,000 (SOAR license + maintenance + training + internal time)

Now plug into the formula:

ROI = (400,000 − 150,000) / 150,000 × 100

ROI = 250,000 / 150,000 × 100

ROI ≈ 166%

That 166% isn’t just a nice number, it changes the whole conversation.
You’re no longer arguing about features, integrations, or how clever a playbook is. You’re showing that for every dollar spent, the business is getting more than two dollars back, in plain financial language that a CFO can act on.

CategoryAmount (USD)Notes
Labor Savings273,000Reduced manual work
Risk Reduction Value95,000Faster containment
Lower Turnover Savings32,000Reduced burnout/replacement
Total Annual Benefits400,000
SOAR Licensing + Maintenance110,000Vendor contract
Implementation + Training40,000Internal + external
Total Annual Costs150,000
Calculated ROI166%Based on standard formula

Making Your SOAR Investment Pay Off Long-Term

Infographic displaying measuring SOAR effectiveness roi with baseline metrics and ROI calculation formula

Proving ROI isn’t a single report you build and forget. It’s an ongoing habit. The numbers you track today should guide what you improve next week, next quarter, and next year. Continuous improvements in integrating SOAR with SIEM and EDR tools amplify your automation’s effectiveness, providing richer data sources and more seamless workflows that boost operational efficiency and security posture over time.

Regular reviews of your automation metrics will show you two things very clearly:

  • Where playbooks are crushing it
  • Where workflows are dragging or breaking

So you might see:

  • The phishing playbook closes cases quickly, with very little human help.
  • The vulnerability management workflow keeps timing out, or needs analyst intervention halfway through.

That kind of visibility tells you where to focus your tuning:

  • Remove unnecessary steps in weak playbooks
  • Add tracking nodes where data is missing
  • Standardize successful patterns from “star” playbooks into weaker ones

This way, your automation doesn’t just stay “good enough.” Its value keeps building, as you adapt it to new threats, new data sources, and new workflows.

Turning ROI Into a Story People Can See

One of the easiest mistakes is to do all this analysis and then hide it in a spreadsheet. That’s where momentum dies.

Instead, make the results simple to see and easy to reuse. For example, build a small dashboard for security and business leadership that highlights:

  • MTTR reduction over time
  • Weekly or monthly analyst-hours saved
  • Automation coverage (percent of alerts touched by SOAR)
  • Top-performing playbooks by time saved or cases handled

Then translate each metric into what it means for the business, not just the SOC:

  • Faster MTTR → less downtime, fewer disrupted teams
  • Hours saved per week → analysts can focus on higher-impact investigations
  • Higher automation coverage → more consistent responses, fewer missed alerts

You can even frame it in terms of business enablement:

  • “Because our SOC is more efficient, we can support new products, new regions, or more customers without linearly adding headcount.”

When leaders see a clear connection between:

  • SOAR metrics (time saved, MTTR, coverage)
  • Business outcomes (reduced risk, lower costs, more capacity for growth)

then budget conversations change. You’re not just defending a tool, you’re showing a strategic asset that:

  • Reduces operational drag
  • Lowers risk exposure
  • Frees people to focus on harder, more valuable work

And the data you’ve been tracking all along—that’s your proof.

Common Pitfalls and How to Sidestep Them

Credits : The L&D Academy

Even with the best intentions, teams often stumble when measuring SOAR effectiveness. The most frequent mistake is focusing only on the big, flashy metrics like overall MTTR reduction. That’s important, but it doesn’t tell the whole story. 

You need to dig into the granular data from individual playbooks to understand what’s working and what’s not. Another trap is failing to account for the initial time investment. Building playbooks and training the team has a real cost, and ignoring it inflates your early ROI figures.

Some organizations also forget to measure qualitative benefits. How has automation affected analyst morale and retention? Has it improved collaboration with other IT teams? These softer gains are harder to put a dollar figure on, but they contribute significantly to long-term SOC health. Finally, avoid setting and forgetting your metrics. 

The threat landscape changes, and your playbooks should evolve with it. A quarterly review of your automation coverage and success rates ensures your SOAR investment remains aligned with current risks. This proactive approach prevents your ROI from decaying over time.

  • Overemphasizing headline metrics without granular playbook data.
  • Neglecting the initial setup and training costs in ROI calculations.
  • Failing to track qualitative improvements like team morale.
  • Not conducting regular reviews to keep automation relevant.

The goal is to create a measurement framework that is both comprehensive and adaptable. By anticipating these common missteps, you can build a more accurate and persuasive case for your automation efforts. It turns potential weaknesses in your argument into strengths.

FAQ

How can you track SOAR ROI metrics with simple MTTR measurement and SOC efficiency data

You can track SOAR ROI metrics when you measure baseline MTTR, incident volume tracking, response time reduction, and analyst productivity gains. You compare automated vs manual steps with workflow automation logs. You check labor cost reduction, cost savings SOAR, and total benefits calculation. You add time saved calculator results to incident response ROI and return on investment security numbers.

What data helps you measure security orchestration ROI and automation effectiveness over a set date range

You can use date range reports, automation coverage rate, playbook automation logs, playbook success rate, and enrichment time savings. You study false positive reduction and alert fatigue mitigation. You add breach prevention value, incident triage speed, and containment time metrics. You place everything into a total cost of ownership security view to see security orchestration ROI.

How do you compare implementation costs SOAR with annual savings projection and real world SOAR savings

You check implementation costs SOAR, licensing expenses, training ROI impact, and integration complexity costs. You add annual savings projection, currency adjusted savings, and real world SOAR savings. You place numbers in an ROI formula security sheet. You include remediation ROI, compliance automation ROI, and cyber insurance savings to understand cost benefit analysis and quantitative SOAR value.

How do you use automated vs manual data to study value realization SOAR across all response playbooks

You review response playbook ROI, automation coverage rate, enrichment playbook efficiency, and workflow automation logs. You check SOC maturity metrics, efficiency benchmarking, and security operations center metrics. You add proactive response metrics, adaptive playbooks value, and AI driven automation ROI. You track qualitative benefits tracking and sustained ROI measurement to see value realization SOAR across time.

How can KPI dashboard SOAR help you show incident response ROI to leaders who need budget justification SOAR

You load KPI dashboard SOAR with mean time to detect, anomaly detection savings, digital forensics acceleration, and evidence collection automation. You add reporting dashboard ROI and executive reporting metrics. You align numbers with CISO KPI alignment and budget justification SOAR. You compare cloud SOAR economics, on premise vs SaaS ROI, and TCO reduction to support return on investment security.

Turning SOAR Metrics into Strategic Wins

The numbers you track give you evidence you can bring to leadership. Clear ROI turns your SOAR into a business asset. You secure future budget. You also build a culture that relies on data. Start with a clean baseline. Track your metrics every week. Share your results in simple terms. Let the data show the value of your work.

You can strengthen these results with expert support. Explore our consulting services for MSSPs. You get guidance to simplify operations, cut tool sprawl, and improve service quality. The services include needs analysis, vendor shortlisting, PoC support, and actionable recommendations. You build a stack that fits your business goals and operational maturity.

References

  1. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/5/365
  2. https://www.digitalsecurityforensics.org/digisecforensics/article/view/45

Related Articles

Avatar photo
Richard K. Stephens

Hi, I'm Richard K. Stephens — a specialist in MSSP security product selection and auditing. I help businesses choose the right security tools and ensure they’re working effectively. At msspsecurity.com, I share insights and practical guidance to make smarter, safer security decisions.